The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gambling.

No, they weren't personally in participation, however the world-famous celebs were notably included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial sites providing both totally free casino-style video games and lucrative prizes, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of lots of video gaming corporations, not to discuss lawsuit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as standard casinos, only without the oversight, customer protections and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the high 24-percent federal gambling levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the company deals with allegations of illegal gaming in a New York lawsuit that declares VGW uses celebrity endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its product. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm uncertain" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business running multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a series of celebs from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any differences between standard gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to play at Chumba Casino, where lots of - however not all - video games are complimentary

Drake has an offer with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he routinely touts on social media

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads normally center around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the potential for actual sports betting losses.

Others lure clients with promises of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement displaying Drake's cars, airplanes and mansions before pivoting to footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never ever offered up.'

The disparity in between gaming sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, many of the gamers on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for complimentary.

'Most social sweeps clients never ever purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the typical deposit or bet size at real-money online gambling websites.'

Social gambling establishments use clients a chance to play casino-style video games with good friends. Players have the option to purchase valueless currency frequently referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for genuine money, however can be used to open different functions within the games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, permitting customers to get other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad showing off Drake's automobiles, planes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all but seven states, which has assisted to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't require generally require identification. However, sites like Chumba will request IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit customers to send mail-in ask for totally free sweeps coins, provided the gamers follow painfully particular instructions. What's more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins just for signing up, thereby providing a factor to try their hands at any number of gambling establishment games for a chance to win - or lose - real money.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is merely a way of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are just a kind of online entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to play at social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever have to spend for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is an important distinction between social sweeps and conventional online gambling sites like casinos.'

Think of the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that provide them the chance to win financially rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself doesn't satisfy the meaning of gambling in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing approach for promoting all type of daily businesses in the United States, whatever from hamburgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are regularly used by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous gambling market insiders, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, therefore suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're usually not tied to casino-style games of opportunity,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just cash giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the characteristics frequently connected with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos offer" casino-like" payments, normally 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the normal payout percentage for a temporary advertising sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the earnings earned by the company [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the internet coffee shops that emerged in Florida, using consumers the possibility to play casino-style games for genuine rewards. Many of those brick-and-mortar establishments have considering that been shuttered over claims of unlawful gaming.

DJ Khaled is amongst several celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos ought to deal with similar scrutiny.

'These differences are not approximate,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have actually consistently been cited by courts and state chief law officer as essential consider identifying that a sweepstakes promotion remained in reality a guise for prohibited gaming.'

Among the gambling establishment industry's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being deprived of securities and states are passing up considerable tax and earnings chances as this sports betting replaces that performed through controlled channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have taken legal action against social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without admitting any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW agreed to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, stating the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent lawsuit, which is mostly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'prohibited sports betting business. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as defendants in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We normally don't discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com via email. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play games across the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, creating not just excellent video games, user experiences and home entertainment, but also guaranteeing this is done safely, properly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we intend to vigorously defend any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The concerns between standard online gaming and sweepstakes casinos might prove problematic for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with standard gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the exact same time the leagues want to predict a strong position versus illegal gambling - especially when trying to tamp down the periodic sports betting scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time restriction from the NBA over claims he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting presumably illegal sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA representative nor the players' agents responded to DailyMail.com's requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise neglected to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to explain to consumers the differences and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our business practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'Some of our worths are" our players come initially" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious unlawful gambling websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at threat as well as courting civil and class actions by customers who declare harm,' Glaser said. 'There is also some risk that state regulators and state attorneys basic rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with illegal sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton